Why Insurance Companies Suck!

Posted on

I speak with insurance adjusters nearly every day of my life on behalf of my clients. Let me explain how the game is played. My client is injured in a car accident, trucking accident, or some other catastrophic accident. The driver that hit them was properly insured. They paid their bills on time, they thought they had a very reputable company like Allstate, GEICO, and Progressive and they generally thought that if in the unfortunate situation they get into an accident they would be covered.

WRONG

In my experience insurance companies follow the three D’s: Delay, Deny and Defend. The insurance company will delay paying out the money to the person that is hurt in the car accident. They want to hold onto the money as long as possible that way they can invest it into the stock market or do whatever mischievous things insurance companies do.

They also deny the claim outright. I have a case currently where the insurance company has only offered $1,500 dollars to my client in a case where the damage is at least $30,000. They say there is no damage to the property. In the same breath they will not renew her insurance because there is substantial damage. This is not a typo. Do you see how absolutely ridiculous that is?

Even if the insurance company comes to grip that their insured is at fault and they are supposed to pay—they will defend. They will dig in their claws and fight to the bitter end to hold onto every dollar. 

We battle against insurance companies every single day. We work on setting them up to penalize them when they are acting against their insured’s interests. We hold them accountable when they delay, deny and defend in bad faith. Missouri law is very favorable in punishing an insurance company who simply does not want to pay. We use that law in order to hold the insurance companies accountable.

How Can You Protect Yourself Against Insurance Companies?

  • Write down everything they tell you
  • Get a lawyer involved early if there is a lot at stake
  • Know your coverage- you should know whether you have uninsured motorist coverage, underinsured motorist coverage, an umbrella policy, and/or phantom motorist coverage.
  • Get more coverage!

Working with an insurance company can be absolutely frustrating. Our law firm has the experience to get the compensation that you deserve. We will go to bat for you against large, greedy companies to make them pay what is deserved. Let us know if you need help and we will be happy to give you a free consultation.

Have you had any bad run-ins with insurance companies? Tell us about it below.

 

 

Our Reputation

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is made up of some of the nation’s foremost legal minds in the mass-tort field. That’s why our clients & co-counsel partners choose us.

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee, and Co-Chair of the Law & Briefing Committee in MDL 2846:

In Re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2974:

In Re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2924:

In Re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation

Along with the aforementioned MDLs,

Plaintiff’s Counsel has prosecuted thousands of cases across other Multi-District Litigations and Mass-Torts, including:

MDL No. 3043:

Acetaminophen ASD/ADHD Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2753:

Atrium Medical Corp. C-Qur Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2782:

Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 627:

In Re: Physiomesh Litigation, MCL

MCL No. 633:

In Re: Prolene Hernia System Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2750:

Cook Medical, Inc., IVC Filters Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2641:

Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2326:

In Re: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2606:

Benicar (Olmesartan) Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2666:

In Re: Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2591:

Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation

MDL No. 2936:

In Re: Smity’s/CAM2303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluid Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 630:

In Re: Proceed Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2543:

In Re: General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation

MDL No. 2004:

In Re: Mentor Corp. ObTape Transobturator Sling Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2187:

In Re: C. R. Bard, Inc. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2325:

In Re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2327:

In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2387:

In Re: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 251:

In Re: Neomedic Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

Highly Awarded Trial Attorneys

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is one of the nation’s leading mass-tort & personal-injury law firms. The founding partners, Adam & Robert, have been selected to serve on steering committees for some of the largest pharmaceutical mass-tort cases.

Working With Us

Partnering with Krause & Kinsman is easy. When you partner with Krause & Kinsman, you can be sure that our mutual clients’ complex matters are handled with the utmost care and dedication. In addition to our top-notch representation, we will ensure our mutual clients receive frequent communication about the status of their cases.

Partner With Us

Why Us?

Recognized leaders in mass-torts with vast experience in complex litigation.

Your clients will appreciate the high-quality representation provided.

Your clients will consistently real-time updates on the status of their case via video, email, text, and phone.

Get real-time updates on the status of our mutual clients while their cases progress.

Collaborate on the case together and receive co-counsel fees.